Skip to content
New research:Dots vs. Muse for Developers
/coding-agentsclaude-code

Anthropic

Claude Code

Terminal-first coding agent for repository editing, shell commands, code review, and long-running implementation workflows.

CLIIDEDesktopWebCloudMobileActiveProprietaryBYOKMCP Yes

Recent product updates

Reviewed

Selected releases and additions, with links to the original announcements.

Claude Code adds Mods

Version 2.1.287 lets plugins customize deeper agent behavior. Its optional You should know mod runs a side agent to flag missed issues; it requires a first-party session with telemetry enabled.

12.5M

Attributed output

GitHub public-attribution count, 2026-06-09

#1

Index rank · all agents

#1 of 40 CLI agents

$2.5B+

Business signal

Claude Code run-rate revenue · Feb 2026

$20/mo Pro

Entry price

Shared usage limits

Not published

GitHub stars

No public repo

11,739,789

npm demand/wk

Adjusted from raw npm channel

573,916,723

npm installs to date

Since 2025-02-24

From the public record

What the public PRs reveal

50 PRs · 50 repositories

Search window: – · captured Oct 14, 2026 (UTC)

Claude-attributed work gets CodeRabbit follow-ups

Separate study: CodeRabbit follow-ups, May 25–October 11, 2026

In CodeRabbit’s May 25–October 11 audit, we found 51 original PRs crediting Claude, followed by 53 CodeRabbit auto-fix PRs; 39 follow-ups were merged. This cohort was selected through CodeRabbit, so it cannot tell us what fraction of this agent’s overall work receives follow-up fixes. Credits can name a model without identifying its client.

Specific work you can inspect

elizaOS/eliza: “fix(plugins): remove settings that no code reads” (merged). storytold/gridcraft: “io: remove the .sctmp temporary file when a save fails” (merged).

This is a sample of publicly attributed work, not total usage or a market-share estimate. Repositories are not customers. Attribution is declared in metadata, not independently verified tool execution; it does not prove exclusive authorship or autonomy. PR status is recorded at capture; merged does not establish correctness.

Method and audit data

Up to 50 most recently created public PR search results within the audit window; post-filtered for body attribution or Codex branch. A recent convenience sample, not a random or exhaustive sample.

Returned records dated Oct 11, 2026–Oct 11, 2026.

Download the dated audit evidence (JSON)

Activity Over Time

Weekly attributed output on public GitHub. Output visible through the agent's own bot or workflow is exact; output measured through declared attribution is an estimate. Window: 2025-02-03 to 2026-10-12.

Model mixtrailing 8 weeks, 2026-08-24 to 2026-10-18

Which Claude model its users actually run, from visible public attribution metadata on Claude-marked commits.

Opus 76.1%Sonnet 23.3%Haiku 0.6%

npm Installs Over Time

Weekly npm downloads since 2025-02-24, the install-demand trajectory.

Market

Developer output

12.5M

Public GitHub commits attributed to Claude

Claude Code declares attribution on the work it produces, so coverage is strong. The headline is a point-in-time estimate that moves between measurements and a floor: squash-merges, private repositories, and a separate review integration sit outside it.

Last full week (ending 2026-10-18): 10.6M signed commits (+4.4% week over week), search estimate.

Distinct users: 8,849 humans opened the 12,399 most recently sampled PRs, about 1.4 PRs per person.

Merge rate: 91.6% of its pull requests get merged (6,335,925 of 6,916,377 over 8 settled weeks, 2026-08-10 to 2026-10-04). The window ends about ten days back so recently-opened PRs have had time to merge.

GitHub review activity: 3.5% of its merged PRs had at least one GitHub review record before merging; the other 96.5% had none. This is a broad weekly signal and can include bot reviews; the human-review read below comes from the enriched PR sample.

In significant repos (company-owned or 10+ stars), 30.5% of its merged PRs got a human review. Across all sampled repos, the rate is 20%. Human review means a non-author, non-bot GitHub reviewer in the PR-lifecycle sample. 1 sampled PRs had more than 100 review records, so those reviewer lists are marked truncated.

Median time to merge: 38 min. The unreviewed median is 0.36h. The human-reviewed median is 32.58h. From a 120-PR sample merged 2026-07-30 to 2026-08-28.

Test-inclusion: 47.5% of its sampled merged PRs touch a test file. This is a rough read on production readiness. 4 large PRs hit GitHub's 100-file path read cap, so treat this as a floor.

Flow share: 29.8% of the 1999 most recent public PRs sampled (595 PRs, 2 windows, last 2026-09-27).

Task lens: 4.2M agent-opened PRs. The declared mark can be removed by the team, so treat this as approximate.

Snapshot 2026-06-09, confidence Medium, tracked since 2026-06-09. Read the methodology.

Index rank · all agents
#1 of 47 · #1 among CLI agents
Demand share
27.5% of tracked npm demand floor
GitHub share
No public repo
npm channel
6.4M raw downloads/week (Native preferred)

Best fit

Terminal-first engineeringLarge refactorsClaude-native teamsAgentic code review
  • Enterprise use represents over half of Claude Code revenue, according to Anthropic.
  • Anthropic says Claude Code weekly active users doubled after January 1, 2026, but it does not publish the absolute WAU count.
  • Claude Code docs now recommend native install and package-manager routes, so npm downloads are treated as one visible install channel rather than total usage.
  • Anthropic says business subscriptions to Claude Code quadrupled since the start of 2026.
  • Anthropic cites SemiAnalysis estimating Claude Code authors 4% of all public GitHub commits, double the prior month.
  • Anthropic's May 2026 Series H valued the parent company at $965B and said company run-rate revenue crossed $47B earlier that month.
  • By February 2026 Claude Code's run-rate had reached about $2.5B, roughly half a billion above Cursor's at the time, and developers reported switching from Cursor to Claude Code (Bloomberg, via Business Insider).
  • Anthropic was, at one point, heavily dependent on Cursor: a Cursor employee estimated it was 40-50% of Anthropic's revenue before Claude Code launched (Business Insider).
npm channel caveat: Native preferredExpand

Claude Code's npm downloads halved in late April 2026 — a distribution change, not a usage decline.

In late April 2026 Anthropic moved the recommended install to native installers (Homebrew, WinGet, apt, dnf, apk). The npm package still works and installs the same binary, so the drop from ~13M to ~8M weekly is installs shifting off npm, not fewer users. npm now counts only one channel and understates total adoption.

Demand floor
11.7M / wk

Trailing 4-week npm average. Native installs are unobserved, so this remains a floor.

Latest npm week
6.4M

Complete Mon-Sun week when cron-backed

Peak npm week
22.6M

Observed public npm range

4-week average
11.7M

As of 2026-10-18

All sourced signals (7)Expand
SignalValueTypeConfidence
npm downloads (2026-09-18 to 2026-09-24)11,936,572Public metricHigh
Recommended install pathNative installer; npm remains supportedOfficialHigh
Claude Code run-rate revenue$2.5B+ and more than doubled since Jan. 1, 2026OfficialHigh
Claude Code business subscriptionsQuadrupled since Jan. 1, 2026OfficialHigh
Claude Code enterprise mixEnterprise use is over half of Claude Code revenueOfficialHigh
Public GitHub commit shareSemiAnalysis estimated 4% of public GitHub commits were authored by Claude CodeReportedMedium
Anthropic valuation$965B post-money in May 2026 Series HOfficialHigh

Where Claude Code Works

Languages
TypeScript36%
Python21%
JavaScript10%
HTML7%
Rust6%
Go5%
Frameworks
React21%
Next.js18%
Flutter9%
Astro6%
Electron6%
SwiftUI5%
Industries
AI/ML35%
Devtools14%
Gaming9%
Finance6%
Media6%
Security3%
Countries
Germany11%
United States of America10%
United Kingdom8%
France7%
Brazil4%
India4%

Share of Claude Code's own classified sampled work by segment; countries reflect where its PR authors are based. Full breakdowns: Languages, Frameworks, Industries, Map.

Pricing And Economics

Expand

Pricing snapshot: 2026-09-25. Check the vendor for current terms.

Claude Code is included with eligible Claude subscriptions. Pro and Max share usage limits with Claude; API usage is billed separately.

Entry price
$20/mo Pro
Top self-serve price
n/a
Pricing unit
Shared usage limits
Token transparency
Task quota
Included usage
Limits depend on the model, context, and task. Prompt counts are not fixed entitlements.
Overage path
Additional usage credits can extend usage. Fable access and billing depend on the plan and provider.

Retail Token Equivalent

Allowance is not a fixed token entitlement. Consult the linked vendor pricing and your account’s usage limits.

PlanPriceAllowanceUnitToken / Overage Notes
Pro$20/moShared Claude and Claude Code allowance.Shared usage limits
Max$100/moStarts at $100/month; 5x and 20x usage options.Shared usage limits

Unit Economics (Measured)

Mean API-retail cost per completed task on the Artificial Analysis coding agent index (358 tasks across 3 suites, pass@1 over 3 runs, snapshot 2026-06-09). These are pay-per-token API costs, not subscription effective costs.

HarnessAA indexCost / taskTokens / taskTime / task
Claude Code, Opus 4.8 (max)77.2$4.624.8M18m
Claude Code, Opus 4.8 (medium)67.2$1.601.7M9m
Claude Code, Opus 4.7 (max)66.6$4.145.7M14m
Claude Code, Opus 4.7 (medium)59.9$1.241.7M6m
Claude Code, Qwen3.7 Plus (thinking)53.1$4.983.3M11m
Claude Code, GLM-5.152.7$2.264.8M22m
Claude Code, Opus 4.6 (medium)51.3$1.272.2M7m
Claude Code, Kimi K2.650.5$0.763.7M42m
Claude Code, DeepSeek V4 Pro (high)50.1$0.353.5M18m
Claude Code, Sonnet 4.6 (medium)49.4$1.022.2M9m

Break-even vs API retail on the top harness (Claude Code, Opus 4.8 (max), $4.62/task): Pro at $20/mo covers about 4 tasks; Max at $100/mo covers about 22 tasks. Assumes the Artificial Analysis task mix.

Summary checked 2026-09-25.

Claude Code is included with eligible Claude subscriptions. Pro and Max share usage limits with Claude; API usage is billed separately.

  • Limits depend on the model, context, and task. Prompt counts are not fixed entitlements.
  • Additional usage credits can extend usage. Fable access and billing depend on the plan and provider.
  • Sonnet 5.5 requires Claude Code 2.1.284 or later. Model aliases resolve differently across providers; check the model configuration docs.

Company And Funding

Expand
Ownership
Private
Founded
2021
Headquarters
San Francisco, CA
Employees
~5,200
Total raised
~$132B
Most recent round
Series H, $65B (Apr 2026)
Round leads
Altimeter Capital, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, Sequoia Capital, Coatue, GIC

Parent-company total. Claude Code is one of several Anthropic products, not a separately financed entity.

Notable investors

GoogleAmazonSequoia CapitalLightspeedSalesforce VenturesMenlo Ventures

Enterprise And Security

Expand
SSO / SCIM
Yes
Deployment
VPC / dedicated
Trains on your code
Not trained on your code
Zero data retention
Enterprise tier

Compliance

SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001HIPAA (BAA available)GDPR

Admin controls

SAML SSO / SCIMAudit logsRole-based access

Anthropic does not train models on code sent under commercial terms. Enterprise customers can add a zero-data-retention addendum, and Claude Code can route through Amazon Bedrock or Google Vertex in a customer cloud account.

Product

Providers

Anthropic

Model families

Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5Claude Haiku

Capabilities

Repo editingTerminal commandsPlanningSubagentsMCPCode reviewWeb searchPluginsClaude Mods

Tradeoffs

  • Claude-only by default
  • Plan limits are usage-based estimates rather than fixed message counts